Inspecting Beyond the Curve with IRIS

Source: https://www.eddyfi.com/en/appnote/inspecting-beyond-the-curve-with-iris

Industrial boilers come in many shapes and sizes and have been used for more than a century. For instance, they are used by ships to produce steam that moves reciprocating pistons, and therefore propels the vessels. These boiler tubes are subject to a very harsh working environment, and the tubes used are susceptible to —among other things— wall thinning. IRIS, or Internal Rotary Inspection System, qualifies as one of the best inspection techniques; however, conventional IRIS components are not designed to pass through some of the more challenging tube designs such as the S-shaped vertical tubes presented in this application.

The Challenge

Use an ultrasonic testing internal rotary inspection system to assess the straight sections of vertical boiler tubes featuring elbows.

Boiler tubes are subject to high temperatures and the potential presence of sulfur oxides under normal operation. With time, damage mechanisms such as inner erosion or outer corrosion are induced and can become problematic. Although an IRIS inspection can offer accurate thickness measurements, the shape of some of the boilers featuring vertical tubes with bent sections can limit the use of this technique. This makes them impossible to scan using conventional IRIS probes. Furthermore, access to the boiler tubes may be restricted, and the tubes can only be scanned from the lower end. The challenges presented are negotiating the bends in order to inspect the straight sections of the tube, providing local immersion of the steam turbine while inspecting vertical tubes from their lower end, and ensuring good turbine centering as a misaligned IRIS probe can yield signal loss.

The Solution

A flexible IRIS probe capable of passing through elbows with a specified bend radius for two specific tube lines.

The goal here is to inspect the straight parts of the boiler tubes. To succeed, the probe must first pass through an aggressive elbow. Not only does the new solution need to travel through this elbow, it also must provide better coverage at the bend vicinities. The following image shows that only a 50-millimeter (2-inch) section before the bend is unable to be inspected because the turbine and centering device are shorter than standard components.